Legal Opinion

Moore v. General Motors Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1985No. 84-1823PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

The sole issue presented for this court’s determination is whether the “cost of the deposition,” recoverable by a claimant whose right to participate or to continue to participate in the State Insurance Fund is sustained or established in an appeal pursuant to R.C. 4123.519, refers only to costs of the court reporter attending the deposition and such reporter’s fee for producing the original and copies required, or whether the phrase also allows, in addition to court reporter costs described, recovery for the fee charged by an expert for preparing for and giving the deposition. R.C. 4123.519…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benda v. FanaOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Perry v. ConnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Searles v. Union Cent. L. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hagemeyer v. SadowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Williams v. ColasurdOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Freeman v. Crown City Mining, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API