Legal Opinion

Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital West

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1990No. 89-433PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, J.

For her proposition of law, appellant asserts that res ipsa loquitur may apply where two persons, acting in concert, are jointly or concurrently in exclusive control of the instrumentality that caused the injury. In Ohio, the rule of res ipsa loquitur is not a rule of substantive law but is a rule of evidence which permits the jury, but not the court in a jury trial, to draw an inference of negligence where “* * * the instrumentality causing the injury was, at the time of the injury, or at the time of the creation of the condition causing the injury, under the exclusive management and control…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 2014

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API