Legal Opinion

Bahm v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1966No. 39756PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The sole question presented in this case is whether inclusion of the words, “in any degree,” in a charge on contributory negligence constitutes prejudicial error. The problem is not novel in Ohio or elsewhere, and there is abundant authority among the various jurisdictions for almost every conceivable disposition of this case. See 87 A. L. R. 2d 1391.

The law in Ohio has itself vacillated in this area. Thus, in Schweinfurth, Admr., v. C., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 60 Ohio St. 215, this court held that it was not error to refuse such a charge containing the words, “in any degree, or in any way”;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bartson v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Alden E. Stilson & Associates, Ltd. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Stone v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Ragone v. Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ramona Freeman, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API