Legal Opinion

Kokitka v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. Nos. 93-1887 and 93-2084PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Per curiam

Case No. 93-2084

The issue before this court in case No. 93-2084 is whether the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction on the weight to be given expert testimony. The charge to the jury instructed as follows:

“If the jury finds to be true a state of the facts materially different from that assumed as true by any such expert, then, of course, the jury should give no weight at all to the conclusions or opinions to [sic ] such expert based upon such assumed facts.”

It is well established that the jury alone, as the trier of fact, has the duty to decide what weight should be given to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Balyint v. Arkansas Best Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hall v. Marion Power Shovel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Conley-Slowinski v. Superior Spinning & Stamping Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API