Legal Opinion

Southside River-Rail Terminal, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Underwriters

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2004No. Nos. C-030400, C-030423 and C-030445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

{¶ 1} In these consolidated appeals, the parties contest whether defendant-appellant and cross-appellee Crum & Forster Underwriters of Ohio (“C & F”) must provide property-damage coverage for the collapse of a storage tank owned by plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant Southside River-Rail Terminal, Inc. and for the loss of its contents separately insured by intervening plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant Reclaim of Norwich, England Insurance Company. The parties dispute coverage under three policies issued to Southside by C & F: the Deluxe Property Form (“the Deluxe form”),…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JTO, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Bosserman Aviation Equipment, Inc. v. United States Liability InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Beattie v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. M&M Bar Corp. v. Northfield Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API