Legal Opinion
Mahnke v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 20, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0021PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
On September 3, 2009, plaintiff Amanda Mahnke suffered serious injuries when she was hit by a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (hereinafter “WMATA”) bus in Washington, D.C. The plaintiff filed a Complaint against WMA-TA, alleging, inter alia, that the bus driver, a WMATA employee, negligently operated the bus. Pending before the Court is WMATA’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent and that precludes a judgment in her favor. The plaintiff denies that she was eontributorily…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Girdler v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Felder Ex Rel. Estate of Ingram v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bianco v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.