Legal Opinion
Barnes v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2006-0315PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Resolving Parties’ Motions in Limine)
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case concerns the District of Columbia Department of Corrections’ (“DOC”) practice of overdetaining and strip searching its inmates. The plaintiffs, former inmates subject to overdetentions and strip searches, filed a class action against the District of Columbia (“District”) over six years ago. Compl., Feb. 23, 2006, ECF No. 1. This long-running case is virtually identical to a prior case before this Court, Bynum v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 02-956(RCL)…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Mosquera-MurilloDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Heller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Shea v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- ['FLYTHE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.