Legal Opinion

Stiefel v. Lindemann

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 22, 1994No. 11827; 11834PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

In these appeals from the judgments that followed two actions tried to the court, the primary questions to be resolved are whether the defendants have an easement (1) over land of the plaintiff Steven Grossman,1 and (2) over the land of Elizabeth G. Dubois. The resolution of the first question is dependent on the interpretation of a reservation of a right-of-way in a deed from the predecessor in title of the defendants to a predecessor in title of Grossman, or on whether, if the deed is ineffective, an easement by prescription exists in favor of the defendants. In both actions, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. StegallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Simonds v. ShawConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Weeks v. KramerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Tolland Enterprises v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API