Legal Opinion
Weeks v. Kramer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 1997No. AC 15686PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that the restrictive covenant at issue did not run with the land and thus improperly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We agree with the plaintiff and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for a proper resolution of this appeal. The plaintiff owns a hilltop lot, designated as lot no. thirteen, which overlooks Long Island Sound. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Chappell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Leonard Concrete Pipe Co. v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Pulver v. MascoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Stiefel v. LindemannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Moss v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Gardner v. JefferysSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Weeks v. KramerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.