Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ivler

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1982PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

This matter arises out of a dispute over the use of and interference with certain easements existing across both parties’ properties in Stamford. The plaintiffs brought an action seeking damages and an injunction in an attempt to force the defendants to remove certain improvements from an easement which runs across the southerly portion of the defendants’ property and to enjoin them from interfering with their use of that easement. The defendants counterclaimed and alleged that the plaintiffs had no easement across the defendants’ property and also that the plaintiffs have interfered with…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Parker v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  4. Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. American Brass Co. v. SerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Skow v. GoforthSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API