Legal Opinion
Birdsey v. Kosienski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 10, 1953PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIxglis, C. J.
The trial court rendered a judgment enjoining the defendants from obstructing a right of way which the plaintiff claimed to have over their land. On this appeal from that judgment the principal contentions are that the court erred in concluding that the plaintiff owned the right of way, particularly in the course designated by the court, and that, if the right of way existed, the court should have refused an injunction because the plaintiff had been overburdening the easement.
The facts found may be summarized as follows: The defendants are the owners of a tract of land which fronts on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Santoro v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Anzalone v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Swensen v. MarinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- American Brass Co. v. SerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Westland Nursing Home, Inc. v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.