Tolland Enterprises v. Commissioner of Transportation
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Tolland Enterprises, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 51-197a from the assessment of damages for the taking of its property by eminent domain pursuant to General Statutes §§ 13a-73 (b) and 13b-23. The defendant, the commissioner of transportation, determined the value for the purpose of the taking to be $16,060. The plaintiff applied to the Superior Court, pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-76, for reassessment of damages. The trial court found that the defendant had properly determined the value of the property for the purpose of the taking. On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- H. J. Lewis Oyster Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Haggerty v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Tandet v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Konover Development Corp. v. Waterbury Omega, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Commissioner, Trans. v. Leonard-Leonore, No. Cv01-008 53 54 S (Jan. 7, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Lebov Iron Works v. Commissioner of Trans., No. Cv 00-442025 (Apr. 5, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Patel v. Sullivan, No. Cv-00-0437922 S (Aug. 2, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002