Legal Opinion

Tolland Enterprises v. Commissioner of Transportation

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 13, 1994No. 12454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Tolland Enterprises, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 51-197a from the assessment of damages for the taking of its property by eminent domain pursuant to General Statutes §§ 13a-73 (b) and 13b-23. The defendant, the commissioner of transportation, determined the value for the purpose of the taking to be $16,060. The plaintiff applied to the Superior Court, pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-76, for reassessment of damages. The trial court found that the defendant had properly determined the value of the property for the purpose of the taking. On…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. H. J. Lewis Oyster Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Haggerty v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Tandet v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Konover Development Corp. v. Waterbury Omega, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Commissioner, Trans. v. Leonard-Leonore, No. Cv01-008 53 54 S (Jan. 7, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
  3. Lebov Iron Works v. Commissioner of Trans., No. Cv 00-442025 (Apr. 5, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  4. Patel v. Sullivan, No. Cv-00-0437922 S (Aug. 2, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API