Commonwealth v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
On appeal from an order denying P.C.H.A. relief, Keith 0. Smith asks us to review issues which, on direct appeal to the Supreme Court, were not decided, apparently because the issues had not been preserved for appellate review. Appellant makes this request by asking us to hold that contentions regarding the alleged involuntariness of his confession possessed arguable merit and that prior counsel, therefore, must have been ineffective for failing to preserve them for determination on direct appeal.
Smith had been tried and convicted of robbery, conspiracy and murder of the second…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Heydinger v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.