Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 2012PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellant, Elton Eugene Hill (“Hill”), appeals the order dated December 27, 2006 denying his petition for relief pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9541 et seq. (“PCRA”). Hill contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney, inter alia, failed to file a motion to suppress his post-polygraph statements, which he claims the police obtained in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights to counsel. For the reasons set forth here, we reverse the PCRA court’s order and remand this case for…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. KunkleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Com. v. Hill, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Klunk, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API