Legal Opinion

Wyrick v. Fields

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1982No. 82-158PublishedCited by 396 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, over a dissent by Judge Ross, directed that respondent Edward Fields’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus be granted; it did so on the ground that Fields had been convicted with evidence obtained in violation of his Fifth Amendment right to have counsel present at an interrogation. 682 F. 2d 154 (1982). We have concluded that the Court of Appeals’ majority misconstrued this Court’s recent decision in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477 (1981), and imposed a new and unjustified limit on police questioning of a suspect who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Gilbert Henry v. Hayden J. Dees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Effie Sylvia Little BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Edward Fields v. Donald WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by396 opinions

  1. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API