Commonwealth v. Davenport
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
Appellant, Samuel R. Davenport, was convicted of murder of the second degree after a jury trial. Post-trial motions were denied, and appellant was sentenced to eight to twenty years imprisonment. In this appeal, 1 he asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because a statement taken from him should have been suppressed as the product of unnecessary delay between arrest and arraignment in violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 130. Commonwealth v. Futch, 447 Pa. 389, 290 A.2d 417 (1972). We conclude that there was unnecessary delay between appellant’s arrest and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.