Commonwealth v. Harper
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
In this appeal from denial of Post Conviction Hearing Act [PCHA] relief, appellant alleges numerous instances of ineffectiveness of his trial counsel and the illegality of his separate sentences for first degree murder and robbery. Finding neither ineffectiveness of counsel nor a double jeopardy violation, we affirm.
The material facts are as follows.
The victim, Matthew Boylan, was robbed and fatally wounded while working in his neighborhood grocery store at approximately 11:35 A.M. on September 13, 1975. Detective Gerrard, the supervising detective, arrived at the victim’s store…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. TarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Commonwealth v. QuierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Harper v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Com. v. Bocchicchio, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Bullock, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.