Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1985No. 01481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

In this appeal from denial of Post Conviction Hearing Act [PCHA] relief, appellant alleges numerous instances of ineffectiveness of his trial counsel and the illegality of his separate sentences for first degree murder and robbery. Finding neither ineffectiveness of counsel nor a double jeopardy violation, we affirm.

The material facts are as follows.

The victim, Matthew Boylan, was robbed and fatally wounded while working in his neighborhood grocery store at approximately 11:35 A.M. on September 13, 1975. Detective Gerrard, the supervising detective, arrived at the victim’s store…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. TarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. QuierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Harper v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Com. v. Bocchicchio, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Bullock, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API