Tisdale v. Bryant
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for the partition of some four hundred and eighty acres of land in Kings County, it being alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff and the defendant Melodile Bryant each owned an undivided one-half interest in the land. The other defendants had liens on the property and they made no contest, but appellants in their answer denied that respondent had any interest whatever in the land, and they claimed that Melodile Bryant was the sole owner thereof. They also filed a cross-complaint, seeking thereby to set aside a certain agreement, attached to their pleading and marked,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Silliman v. United States. United States v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Goebel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Bank of Benson v. HoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- World Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kurtz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Williams v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Jacobson v. MeadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lane Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.