Legal Opinion
Starks v. Field
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1939No. 27357. Department TwoPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
Plaintiff instituted action in the superior court for the purpose of quieting title to real property, to have a collateral agreement adjudged void, to effect the return to him of certain securities, and to obtain an accounting.
We briefly state the pertinent portions of the complaint as follows: The first portion alleges the corporate capacity of the Peshastin Fruit Growers Association and The Leavenworth State Bank, and that A. G. Stage is president of the former corporation and Robt. B. Field of the latter; that Herman Howe is an attorney practicing at Leavenworth; that plaintiff is the son…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- French v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Eyak River Packing Co. v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Lindley v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Pecos Construction Co. v. Mortgage Investment Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Bell Bakeries, Inc. v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. ShulmanWashington Supreme Court · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.