Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Linn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1882PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to Superior, Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The action in this case is upon a promissory note given by defendants, October 20, 1880, to the Belle Isle Ice Co., and by that company transferred to the plaintiffs after it fell due. The execution of the note is admitted, and the only question in the case is, whether the defendants have established any defence to it.

The defence set up is that the note was obtained without consideration, and by means of duress. The facts which are supposed to show duress are the following :

November 8, 1879, the Belle Isle Ice Co. entered into a contract with the defendants below, who are brewers in the city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Moore v. Detroit Locomotive WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  4. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API