Legal Opinion

Williams v. Reich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8266PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OGDEN, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff rescinding and setting aside, upon the ground of failure of consideration, a conveyance of real estate executed by plaintiff to defendant and a written agreement entered into by the parties, the terms of which are set forth below.

The complaint contains three counts. The first count alleges the conveyance to defendant by plaintiff of three parcels of property by deed executed upon the sole consideration of the promise of defendant to marry plaintiff; the subsequent execution by defendant of a reconveyance to plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Haskins v. Certified Escrow & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Hall v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. In Re the Marriage of HeinzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Conley v. SharpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API