Jacobson v. Mead
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
When plaintiffs in January of 1927 signed an agreement to purchase a city lot they demanded that there be inserted in the contract, in addition to the usual street improvement provisions therein contained, a further covenant that vendor would plant trees in the parkway along the street upon which the lot faced. This insertion was made by vendor’s agent. A few days later, upon making the balance of the down payment of $1340, plaintiffs again requested confirmation of the agreement as to the planting of trees and other improvements, and the vendor’s agent gave plaintiffs a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Estate of Lucas v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Maynes v. Angeles Mesa Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Pay Less Drug Stores v. BechdoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.