Legal Opinion

Young v. Idaho Department of Law Enforcement

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1993No. 19902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Virgil and Katherine Young appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action to compel the Department of Law Enforcement to issue them a retail liquor license. In October, 1991, the Department offered the Youngs a license, but expressly advised that in order to claim the license, they must, within ten days, notify the Department in writing of their intent to accept. When it did not receive written notice from the Youngs within ten days, the Department dropped them from its waiting list and offered the license to another applicant, Brent Hansen.

The Youngs contend on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. HamillIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ray v. Nampa School Dist. No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Evans v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Keesee v. FetzekIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. Boise Telco Federal Credit UnionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Record Steel & Construction, Inc. v. Martel Construction, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Winn v. EatonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Naranjo v. Idaho Department of CorrectionIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API