Legal Opinion

Ray v. Nampa School Dist. No. 131

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1991No. 18196PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether Thomas Ray had an employment contract with the Nampa School District and whether his due process rights were violated when his employment as a maintenance electrician with the School District was terminated.

FACTS

Appellant Ray was hired on May 21, 1984 by the School District as a maintenance electrician. He was given a Maintenance Employee’s Handbook of Employment Conditions and required to sign for its receipt. Ray was paid by the hour and required to do electrical maintenance work as well as other miscellaneous jobs assigned…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hummer v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Eliopulos v. KnoxIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API