Legal Opinion

Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. Hamill

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1982No. 13546PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Hamill in an action alleging breach of contract and architectural malpractice by Hamill. Summary judgment was granted on the basis that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 1966 plaintiff-appellant Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corporation, contracted with defendant-respondent Hamill, an architect, to design and supervise the construction of a second story addition to the Clinic’s then existing structure. The construction was completed and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API