Legal Opinion
La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. Hornbeck
California Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1932No. S. F. 14322; S. F. 14323; S. F. 14324PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The following quotation from our former opinion in this cause furnishes a sufficient statement of facts for the purposes of this discussion:
“The above-named irrigation districts have severally petitioned this court for writs of mandate directing the board of supervisors and district attorneys of San Diego, Glenn and Merced counties to make and approve orders canceling certain described taxes, assessments, tax sales and tax deeds. It is alleged by petitioners and admitted by respondents, that in each case the petitioning irrigation district has acquired certain parcels of real property,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- City St. Improvement Co. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Elbert, Ltd. v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.