Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Beaver Falls Council

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1943No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

In this mandamus proceeding, the order refusing the writ is so well supported by the opinion written by President Judge Reader, that we need only indicate briefly why the order must be affirmed. The learned judge held that Davidson, the plaintiff, was not beneficially interested and therefore not entitled to the writ and that, apart from his incapacity to sue, the court would not order the municipal authorities to exercise judgment and discretion in a certain way.

Beaver Falls is a city of the third class. Davidson is, and for a long time has been, a policeman of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Bell v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  4. Stegmaier v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Chilli v. McKeesport School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Dorris v. Lloyd (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Butcher v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coghlan v. Beaver Falls CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Armer v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API