Legal Opinion

Dombrowski v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1968No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Edwin L. Dombrowski, appellee, was employed by the City of Philadelphia as chief of general accounting from July, 1952 to June, 1966. Under Philadelphia’s municipal retirement plan he is entitled to retirement benefits commencing in August, 1972. Alleging that §2-308 of Philadelphia’s Home Rule Charter requires an “actuarially sound pension and retirement system” and that the city’s contributions in 1966 and 1967 were insufficient to maintain its retirement system on an actuarially sound footing, Dombrowski instituted an action of mandamus to compel appellants to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re 42 PA. C. S. § 1703Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API