Legal Opinion

Chilli v. McKeesport School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1939No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

Appellant obtained an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the directors of the school board to execute a written contract with him for the construction of the East End School Building. Appellant demurred to the answer filed by appellees. The court below discharged the writ.

Mandamus is not a remedy of absolute right, it is an extraordinary writ, discretionary with the court, and can only be obtained when there is a clear legal right in the relator and a positive duty of the defendant to be performed, and where there is no other adequate, specific or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Homan v. MacKeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Potts v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Morganstern Electric Co. v. BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Smart v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Equitable Gas Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. School District v. Framlau Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Anderson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wesenberg v. Bethlehem School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ricapito v. Bethlehem School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API