Legal Opinion
Armer v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1975No. 12274PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
This is a petition for special action by Walter Armer and Dan Clarke, members of the Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD). We accepted jurisdiction because the question is one of statewide importance and because there was no adequate remedy by way of appeal.
We must answer two questions:
1. Did the respondents have standing to bring this action in the trial court?
2. Does Pima County’s ordinance requiring financial disclosure by county officers apply to the petitioners, members of the board of a multicounty water conservation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ponderosa Fire District v. Coconino CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Arizona Department of Water Resources v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Armer v. SUPERIOR CT. OF ARIZ., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.