Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coghlan v. Beaver Falls Council

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1946No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This action is an attempt to compel a city to perform retroactively a duty which should have been performed by it during the course of preceding years. Viewed academically an order compelling such performance might be justified, but from a realistic standpoint such relief would, under the circumstances, be extremely inequitable.

Beaver Falls is a city of the third class, organized as such in 1930. Article XLIII of the Third Class City Law of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932, provides for the establishment of a Police Pension Fund. It directs, section 4301, that such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. Bala & Bryn Mawr Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. PommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Stahl v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Taylor v. AbernathySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Storb v. SchrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Penny v. BowdenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API