Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coghlan v. Beaver Falls Council
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
This action is an attempt to compel a city to perform retroactively a duty which should have been performed by it during the course of preceding years. Viewed academically an order compelling such performance might be justified, but from a realistic standpoint such relief would, under the circumstances, be extremely inequitable.
Beaver Falls is a city of the third class, organized as such in 1930. Article XLIII of the Third Class City Law of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932, provides for the establishment of a Police Pension Fund. It directs, section 4301, that such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. Bala & Bryn Mawr Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. PommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Stahl v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Taylor v. AbernathySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Storb v. SchrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Penny v. BowdenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.