Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Ibebuchi

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2020No. 19ag/19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Ferdinand Uchechukwu Ibebuchi, Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 19, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION This attorney grievance matter involves an attorney who represented a client in a District Court action in which the client was alleged to be an at-fault driver in a multi-vehicle collision. In connection with this representation, the attorney failed to timely respond to discovery requests, failed to appear for trial, and failed to advise his client that a default judgment had been entered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Attorney Grievance v. SilbigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Attorney Grievance v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Attorney Grievance v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API