Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Parris

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 1, 2023No. 22ag/21PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Keith Anthony Parris, Misc. Docket AG No. 22, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Eaves, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE — SANCTION — DISBARMENT Keith Anthony Parris, Respondent, violated several provisions of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) when he failed to file opposition motions on behalf of his client; failed to respond to discovery requests; failed to comply with court orders compelling him to complete discovery; failed to communicate with his client; repeatedly failed to respond to his client’s requests for information;…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API