Jackson v. Alert Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc.

The issue before this court focuses on whether the court of appeals properly concluded that summary judgment should be granted in favor of Alert and Murdock, and denied, except as to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, as to Levinson’s and Awning. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the court of appeals’ ruling.

I

Alert and Murdock

First we turn our attention to whether the trial court and court of appeals correctly determined that Alert and Murdock be granted summary judgment on Jackson’s and Kelley’s claims of strict liability and implied warranty in tort. This court, in…