Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1994No. 94-108PublishedCited by 199 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the relator must establish that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the requested act and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 489, 490, 633 N.E.2d 1128, 1129. Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by199 opinions

  1. Kremer v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Askew v. GoldhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Asberry v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 1998

194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API