Legal Opinion

Murray City v. Hall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1983No. 17329PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The appellant Dan F. Hall appeals his conviction under Murray City Code § 18-115.1, which provides that it is unlawful for any person with a blood alcohol content of .10 percent or greater to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to U.C.A., 1953, § 78-3-5 (Supp.1981). We reverse the conviction and remand the case for a new trial.

This appeal is before this Court on an agreed statement of the facts which is as follows:

Officer Huggard, Murray City Police Department, was the prosecution’s sole witness. He testified that he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. GowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. TenorioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API