Murray City v. Hall
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
The appellant Dan F. Hall appeals his conviction under Murray City Code § 18-115.1, which provides that it is unlawful for any person with a blood alcohol content of .10 percent or greater to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to U.C.A., 1953, § 78-3-5 (Supp.1981). We reverse the conviction and remand the case for a new trial.
This appeal is before this Court on an agreed statement of the facts which is as follows:
Officer Huggard, Murray City Police Department, was the prosecution’s sole witness. He testified that he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. GowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TenorioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.