Legal Opinion

State v. Webb

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1989No. 20890PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Daniel Webb appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of aggravated sexual abuse of a child, a first degree felony, for which he was given a minimum mandatory prison sentence of three years. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404.1(3)(b), (4) (Supp.1984). He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in ruling that hearsay statements by the eighteen-month-old alleged victim, who was not present at trial, qualified for admission into evidence under section 76-5-411(1) of the Code. Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-411(l)(b) (Supp.1988). We reverse the conviction.

The evidence…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API