Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1980No. 16372PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

The defendants, Roger Anderson and Thomas Brackenbury, bring this appeal from their conviction for tampering with a witness in violation of 76-8-508. We uphold the conviction of Roger Anderson, hereinafter “Anderson,” but set aside the conviction of Thomas Brackenbury, hereinafter “Brackenbury.” All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended.

The factual basis of the jury conviction is relatively simple. The defendants, Anderson and Brackenbury, entered the J & M Saloon, located in Soldiers Summit, Utah, to investigate suspected illegal sale of alcohol.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Whitman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API