People v. Gower
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The issue tendered by the defendants and the People in these cases is the admissibility of certain certificates offered by the prosecution to show, by way of foundation for the introduction of the results of breathalyzer tests, that the particular breathalyzer equipment utilized was in proper working order and that the ampoules used contained properly compounded chemicals.
There were certificates, addressed "To whom it may concern”, signed by the director of the State Police scientific laboratory in Albany, certifying as to the results of analyses of ampoules made on specified dates;,…
2Cited by69 opinions
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. SensingTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. AlvarezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.