Legal Opinion

California v. Green

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1970No. 387PublishedCited by 3,125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Section 1235 of the California Evidence Code, effective as of January 1, 1967, provides that “[e]vidence of a statement made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is inconsistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 770.” 1 In People v. Johnson, 68 Cal. 2d 646, 441 P. 2d 111 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1051 (1969), the California Supreme Court held that prior statements of a witness that were not subject to cross-examination when originally made, could not be introduced under this section to prove the charges…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,125 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

3,120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API