California v. Green
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Section 1235 of the California Evidence Code, effective as of January 1, 1967, provides that “[e]vidence of a statement made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is inconsistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 770.” 1 In People v. Johnson, 68 Cal. 2d 646, 441 P. 2d 111 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1051 (1969), the California Supreme Court held that prior statements of a witness that were not subject to cross-examination when originally made, could not be introduced under this section to prove the charges…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,125 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
3,120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.