Legal Opinion

Mabon v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1993No. SC S40331; SC S40316PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This original proceeding consolidates two challenges to a ballot title certified by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure that would add a new section to Article I of the Oregon Constitution. Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), the challenging parties submitted to the Secretary of State timely written comments on the earlier, proposed ballot title. Consequently, they are entitled to bring these challenges to the certified ballot title. ORS 250.085(2) and (5). On review, we modify the ballot title and certify.it as modified.

The text of the proposed initiative measure provides as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sampson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ransom v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Oregon Citizen's Alliance v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bernard v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lowe v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dirks v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Rooney v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 21)Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API