Legal Opinion
Ransom v. Roberts
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1990No. SC S36784; SC S36790; SC S36793PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
This original proceeding consolidates three challenges to a certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure to amend Article I of the Oregon Constitution by adding a new section 41. We modify the certified ballot title.
The proposed initiative measure provides:
“Section 41 is added to Article I of the Oregon Constitution:
“(1) The purpose of the criminal justice system is to protect the people of Oregon. This system shall be based on the principle that each individual is responsible for his/her acts. A just and effective criminal justice system depends on concern for the rights of crime…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Kafoury v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Bauman v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- McCoid v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Potter v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.