Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1993No. SC S40549PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,

In this originad proceeding, petitioner challenges a ballot title certified by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State. See ORS 250.085(2) (providing procedure). Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), petitioner had submitted to the Secretary of State timely written comments on the earlier, proposed ballot title and, therefore, is entitled to bring this challenge to the certified ballot title. ORS 250.085(2). On review, we approve the ballot title certified by the Attorney General.

The operative section of the proposed initiative measure provides as follows:

“Chemical Process Mine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McCann v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Dirks v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Tauman v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API