Legal Opinion
Lowe v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1995No. CC 93C-11972; CA A84110; SC S41790PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioners seek judicial review of a decision by the Court of Appeals that directed that a certain measure be placed on the ballot for the November 1994 general election. Lowe v. Keisling, 130 Or App 1, 882 P2d 91 (1994). That election has been held. The proposed measure failed. The petition for review therefore is moot.
The petition for review is dismissed as moot.
2DissentUnis, J.
I agree with the court that this case is moot. The case became moot because the election on the challenged initiative measure has already been held, and the measure was defeated in the November 8, 1994, statewide…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- City of Troutdale v. Palace Constr. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Meyer v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.