Baker v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*387FADELEY, J.
In these cases, which we consolidate for purposes of decision, two separate petitions challenge a certified ballot title for an initiative measure amending the Oregon Constitution. Each petition raises the issue whether the caption, question, and summary are sufficient to perform the office assigned to them by statute.
The challenged ballot title provides:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION:
GOVERNMENT MAY NOT PROMOTE HOMOSEXUALITY, OTHER LISTED ‘BEHAVIORS’
“QUESTION: Shall Oregon’s constitution forbid government promotion of homosexuality, other listed ‘behaviors’, or recognizing such conduct…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Oregon Citizen's Alliance v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Witt v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.