Legal Opinion

Rooney v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 21)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1995No. SC S42101; SC S42108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the Court

*80GILLETTE, J.

This is a ballot title proceeding consolidating two petitions that challenge the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure designated by the Secretary of State’s office as Elections Division #21. Petitioners Lon T. Mabon and Scott D. Lively (hereafter collectively “Mabon”) are chief petitioners for the measure. They submitted timely written comments to the Secretary of State stating concerns with the draft ballot title and thereby preserved the right to reiterate those concerns in this challenge to the Attorney General’s certified ballot title.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Rogers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rogers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API