H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s dock and business by defendant through the latter’s maintenance of its dock and wharf upon land owned by it and in water adjacent to plaintiff’s dock in the Duluth-Superior harbor.
Plaintiff sets forth two canses of action in its complaint. In both of them it alleged that it is a corporation “engaged in the purchase, sale and transportation of fish and other merchandise” and in the “transportation by water of freight * * * for hire. * * * with fishing boats,” and that it operated freight and other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Bohrer v. Village of Inver GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Johnson v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Highview North Apartments v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- American Automobile Insurance v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.