Johnson v. City of Fairmont
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Ci-iief Justice.
Defendants moved separately for judgment notwithstanding a verdict rendered against them jointly in favor of plaintiffs for $960, or in the alternative for a new trial, and plaintiffs appealed from orders granting defendants’ respective motions for judgment.
Since .1915 plaintiffs, husband and wife, have owned and lived upon a quarter section farm, located northeasterly a mile or two from the city of Fairmont. They there operated a dairy farm, and of course made their home thereon. Center Creek, which is perhaps the only available drainage for the city, runs through…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sloggy v. DilworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Farley v. Crystal Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bohrer v. Village of Inver GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Flanagan v. Gregory & Poole, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
- Brchan v. Crete MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.