Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Fairmont

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1933No. 29,364PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Ci-iief Justice.

Defendants moved separately for judgment notwithstanding a verdict rendered against them jointly in favor of plaintiffs for $960, or in the alternative for a new trial, and plaintiffs appealed from orders granting defendants’ respective motions for judgment.

Since .1915 plaintiffs, husband and wife, have owned and lived upon a quarter section farm, located northeasterly a mile or two from the city of Fairmont. They there operated a dairy farm, and of course made their home thereon. Center Creek, which is perhaps the only available drainage for the city, runs through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sloggy v. DilworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Farley v. Crystal Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bohrer v. Village of Inver GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Flanagan v. Gregory & Poole, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Brchan v. Crete MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API