Legal Opinion

Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo Brother

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1925No. 24,882PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Plaintiff was given a verdict for $4,000 for personal injuries and damages to his automobile resulting from an automobile collision claimed to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

Pleasant avenue in St. Paul extends northeast and southwest. Sherman street intersects from the southeast. We will consider this case as if the streets were square with the world. Plaintiff was driving his Franklin sedan car westerly along the northerly side of Pleasant avenue.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Mora v. FavillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Armstead v. LounsberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Conder v. GriffithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Tedla v. EllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API