Legal Opinion
State v. Faro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1934PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The State’s Attorney filed an information against the defendant alleging that, without a permit therefor, he sold or kept for sale certain alcoholic liquors contrary to the provisions of the General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1933, § 737b. This statute reads as follows: “disposing of liquors without, or contrary to permit. Any person who, without a permit therefor, shall, by sample, by soliciting or procuring orders, or otherwise, sell, or shall offer or expose for sale, or shall own or keep with intent to sell, any alcoholic liquor contrary to the provisions of this chapter and the regulations of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. CorbettSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- State v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Daggett v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.